Mega States (EU, UN, FTAA, NAU)


“There will not be a blueprint for a federal Europe” (Prime Minister Edward Heath, to the House of Commons February 25, 1970.)

“There is no question of any erosion of essential national sovereignty.” (Prime Minister Edward Heath, 1972.)

During an interview with the BBC, Heath was asked: “The single currency; a United States of Europe; was that in your mind when you took Britain in?” “Of course, yes” (Prime Minister Edward Heath, November 1, 1991.)

“Money is the key link which will transform economic union into a political union. Take the central bank to a supra-national level and the national balance of powers collapses...” (Lionel Stoleru)

“The creation of a United Europe must be regarded as an essential step towards the creation of a United World.” (Jean Monnet, at the Congress of Europe Resolutions on Political Union, 1948.)

“We cannot leap into world government in one quick step.... In brief, the precondition for eventual globalization — genuine globalization — is progressive regionalization, because thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units.” (Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski, Gorbachev Summit, 1995.)

“we need to be honest about the fact that we are transferring from the United States, at a practical level, significant authority to a new organization. This is a transformational moment. I would feel better if the people who favor this would just be honest about the scale of change....and twenty years from now we will look back on this as a very important defining moment. This is not just another trade agreement. This is adopting something which twice, once in the 1940's and once in the 1950's, the U.S. Congress rejected. I am not even saying we should reject it; I, in fact, lean toward it. But I think we have to be very careful, because it is a very big transfer of power.” (Newton Leroy Gingrich, just before he voted to break away yet more of our Constitutional freedoms and hand us over to the WTO December 1994.)

“For unlike the conventional American view of the United Nations, membership in the new regime, far from being a privilege, would be mandatory.” (Lincoln P. Bloomfield, written in a U.S. government funded study A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations, Chapter 5. February 24, 1961.)

“With the North American Free Trade Agreement before the U.S. Congress, it is time to begin preparing for its inevitable political implications. If NAFTA passes muster, it will signal the formation, however tentatively, of a new political unit—North America....With economic integration will come political integration. The internationalization of business requires that increasingly important decisions be made at the international level....[NAFTA] is an incipient form of international government.” (Andrew Reding, September 10, 1992.)

“We are witnessing the last remnants of national politics. The member states have already relinquished control of justice, liberty and security. The concept of traditional citizenship has been bypassed in the 21st Century.” (Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos, happily admitting that the EU constitution amounts to a death warrant for the 25 member states February 28, 2005.)

“The sovereignty fetish is still so strong in the public mind, that there would appear to be little chance of winning popular assent to American membership in anything approaching a super-state organization. Much will depend on the kind of approach which is used in further popular education.” (CFR publication, unknown author American Public Opinion and Postwar Security Commitments, p. 35. 1944.)

“1. Search for an international order in which the freedom of nations is recognized as interdependent and in which many policies are jointly undertaken by free world states with differing political, economic and social systems.
2. safeguard U.S. security through preserving a system of bilateral agreements and regional arrangements.
3. Maintain and gradually increase the authority of the U.N.
4. Make more effective use of the International Court of Justice, jurisdiction of which should be increased by withdrawal of reservations by member nations on matters judged to be domestic.” (CFR publication, unknown author Study No. 7, Basic Aims of U.S. Foreign Policy, 1959.)

“As long as states insist that they are the supreme arbiters of their destinies — that as sovereign entities their decisions are subject to no higher authority — international organizations will never be able to guarantee the maintenance of peace.” (Former Secretary-General of the UN Kurt Waldheim, The United Nations: The Tarnished Image, Foreign Affairs, p. 93. 1984.)

“We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the rule of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders.” (George H. W. Bush, January 16, 1991.)

“What these papers revealed more starkly than ever before, was just how deliberately the Heath Government and the Foreign Office set out to conceal from the British people the Common Market’s true purpose. They were fully aware that it was intended to be merely the first step towards creating a politically united Europe, but they were determined to hide this away from view…For 40 years, British politicians have consistently tried to portray it [the Common Market and EU] to their fellow-citizens as little more than an economic arrangement: a kind of free-trading area primarily concerned with creating jobs and prosperity.” (British Journalist Christopher Booker, commenting on records unsealed in the year 2000 from the Edward Heath government)

“Locarno [a European collective security agreement] represents an attempt to arrive at the same end by stages,—by treaties and local regional pacts which are permeated with the spirit of the Geneva Protocol,—these to be constantly supplemented, until at last, within the framework of the League of Nations, they are absorbed by one great world convention guaranteeing world security and peace by the enforcing of the rule of law in inter-state life.” (Eduard Benes speaking on a method to slowly bind the world down in the chains of world tyranny. Foreign Affairs, p. 210. January 1926.)

“Eventually, our long-range objective is to establish…an ensemble of connections and institutions similar to those created by the European Union.” (Mexican President Vicente Fox, May 16, 2002.)

“If Congress had known that there was anything like this in NAFTA, they would never have voted for it.” (Abner Mikva, a former congressman and NAFTA tribunal judge, commenting on chapter 11 of the NAFTA accord that gives power to a NAFTA tribunal which trumps local, state, and federal laws, essentially becoming the supreme law of the land. Two aggrieved parties can also appeal to a United Nations panel for further redress.)

“The EU now has its own constitution with 20,000 laws and 100,000 pages of legal text. It has its own currency, its own central bank, a military reaction force and a fledgling foreign policy. It has executive, legislative and judicial branches. It has its own EU flag, an EU anthem, Beethoven’s Ode to Joy, EU motto “Unity in Diversity”, EU passport, EU car license plates, EU Olympics, EU Youth Orchestra, and an annual EU day, May 9th. If this constitution is in fact adopted, by the nations of Europe who have already given up so much of their sovereignty, then they will in fact completely have abandoned it, and you will see the most dramatic consolidation of power in the history of the world.” (John F. McManus, Robert Welch Council Dinner, May 2004.)

“[NAFTA represents the] first step toward an even larger vision of a free-trade zone for the entire western hemisphere.” (Henry Kissinger, 1993.)

“We reiterate our firm adherence to the principles of international law and the purposes and principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter.…” (From the Declaration of Principles established at the FTAA Summit of the Americas. Declaration of Principles, 1994.)

“Lenin was a man with a mind of great clarity and incisiveness and his ideas have had a profound influence on the course of contemporary history.… His ideals of peace and peaceful coexistence among states…are in line with the aims of the UN Charter.” (UN Secretary-General U Thant, Lenin's Aims like UN's Thant Says, Los Angeles Times, April 7, 1970.)

“For when they shall say, ‘peace and safety,’ then sudden destruction cometh upon them…and they shall not escape.” (Scriptural, 1 Thessalonians, 5:3.)

“What does it tell us about the UN that not a single official thought fit to resign over the first indisputable genocide since the UN Charter was signed?” (Queried human rights activist Alex de Waal after the Rwandan democide. The Quality of Mercy, Los Angeles Times, p. BR1. March 19, 2000.)

“[The UN propaganda film Armed to the Teeth: The World-Wide Plague of Small Arms] imputes to firearms a capacity for independent malice and the ability to ‘murder indiscriminately.’ Curiously, however, the UN seems to believe that firearms are miraculously purged of their demonic qualities when they are wielded by representatives of the State.” (William Norman Grigg, Global Gun Grab: The United Nations Campaign to Disarm Americans, p. 72. October 2001.)

“We must find and exploit the UN's greatest vulnerability—its source of funds. Herein lies one of the best–kept secrets about the United Nations: The UN is entirely dependent upon American sufferance and subsidy. Cut off its access to the U.S. taxpayers, and the UN will quickly collapse.” (William Norman Grigg, Global Gun Grab: The United Nations Campaign to Disarm Americans, p. 121. October 2001.)

“There seems no reason to doubt that such real approval as the Charter has among the people is based upon the belief that if the Charter is put into effect, wars will end.…The Charter will not certainly end war. Some will ask,—why not? In the first place, there is no provision in the Charter itself that contemplates ending war. It is true the Charter provides for force to bring peace, but such use of force is itself war.…The Charter is built to prepare for war, not to promote peace.…The Charter is a war document not a peace document.” (J. Reuben Clark, Prophets, Principles and National Survival, p. 458. 1945.)

“Not only does the Charter Organization not prevent future wars, but it makes it practically certain that we shall have future wars, and as to such wars it takes from us the power to declare them, to choose the side on which we shall fight, to determine what forces and military equipment we shall use in the war, and to control and command our sons who do the fighting.” (J. Reuben Clark, 1945.)

“It is worse than useless for men to cry ‘peace, peace,’ when there is no peace or to flatter themselves that the terrible issue of war can be avoided.…War in their midst is inevitable unless they take the course pointed out by the Lord which, however, they seem determined not to take. They are to be wasted away by war.…Elaborate and beautiful theories may be constructed, but they will crumble into atoms.…and leave those who adopt them in a worse predicament than they were in before.…all such schemes as these for Peace or International Congresses must be barren of all good and permanent results.” (George Q. Cannon, September 21, 1861.)

“…it is a legitimate American national objective to see removed from all nations—including the United States—the right to use substantial military force to pursue their own interests. Since this residual right is the root of national sovereignty and the basis for the existence of an international arena of power, it is, therefore, an American interest to see an end to nationhood as it has been historically defined.” (Walt Rostow, one of the chief engineers of the Vietnam fiasco was chairman of the State Department's policy planning council from 1991 until 1966 when he became the National Security Advisor. He has held membership in the CFR since 1955. He was rejected for employment in the Eisenhower administration three times because he could not pass security checks. The United States in the World Arena, 1960.)

“National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept…Marxism represents a further vital a creative state in the maturing of man's universal vision. Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief…” (Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, p. 72. October 1970.)

CNN's Suzanne Malveaux from the White House: “New efforts tonight to fight a plan by some corporate business leaders and their political allies that could erode the United States sovereignty. The organizers are fighting a proposed North American union that could leave our nation vulnerable on many fronts.”

Lisa Sylvester: “Congress has been left largely out of the loop.”

John McManus, John Birch Society: “They never even heard of this. They don't know a thing about it. What's going on? Well, what's going on is a super elite are taking control.”

Lou Dobbs: “The [governments] of these three countries, without authorization from the American people, without congressional approval; this is straightforward an attack on national sovereignty as there could be, outside of war.

Lisa Sylvester: “And they are doing this behind closed doors, as you mentioned. Congress has been left out of the loop. People don't even know what they are coming up with. But what's clear at this point is that they are moving ahead with this North American union and putting these plans in place. Very frightening.”
(Lou Dobbs Lou Dobbs Tonight, CNN, October 27, 2006.)

CNN Correspondent Christine Romans: “Plans for an integrated North American community by 2010, moving ahead swiftly and under the radar. Robert Pastor is an author of the Council on Foreign Relations document, seen as the project’s road map…. Robert Pastor says a more open public discussion would quiet what he calls conspiracy theorists….Just yesterday Congressman Virgil Goode of Virginia introduced a resolution opposing a NAFTA superhighway and various elements of a North American Union, as the critics call it. And Robert Pastor, Lou, he says, you’re one of those critics, you’re part of a conspiracy theory that just is not founded.”

Lou Dobbs responded: “That I’m a conspiracy theorist? Well, I — that’s very flattering on the part of Mr. Pastor. What he is, is an out of control elitist, who hasn’t been elected or is in any way nominated by this government to do a darn thing that he’s doing. And the fact that this administration and some of this country’s largest corporations are pushing ahead with this, with some of Canada’s leading elites and Mexico’s — there’s not a single thing in this that even remotely has legitimacy and the fact that this Congress, thank goodness that Virgil Goode stepped up here, the fact that this Congress is not demanding an investigation into this right now is sickening. This is elitism run rampant and it’s just — to me, it’s just inexplicable why it’s being tolerated.”
(Lou Dobbs Lou Dobbs Tonight, CNN, September 29, 2006.)

“This [the SPP] is totally outside the U.S. Constitution, virtually an executive branch coup d'etat.” (Dr. Jerome Corsi)

“It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.” (George H. W. Bush, addressing the General Assembly of the U.N. February 1, 1992.)

“Satan is making war against...the very foundations upon which society, government, and religion rest...He plans to destroy freedom–economic, political, and religious, and to set up in place thereof the greatest, most widespread, and most complete tyranny that has ever oppressed men. He is working under such perfect disguise that many do not recognize either him or his methods. There is no crime he would not commit, no debauchery he would not set up, no plague he would not send, no heart he would not break, no life he would not take, no soul he would not destroy. He comes as a thief in the night; he is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Without their knowing it, the people are being urged down paths that lead only to destruction...” (David O. McKay, Conference Report, p. 13. October 1942.)

“Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind as long as (America) remains divided into fifty or sixty independent states until some kind of international system is created…The real problem today is that of world government.” (Foreign Affairs, September 1922.)

“Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.” (Henry Kissinger, at the 1991 Bilderberger Conference held in Evians, France. 1991.)

“[This planned destruction of agency would be] largely done during the war, under the plea of war necessity; it is to be continued after the war under the excuse — if we are not then too cowed to require an excuse — that this new political order is necessary that we may rehabilitate the world.” (J. Reuben Clark, warning the church prior to American entry into World War II, and prior to the establishment of the United Nations. Conference Report, April 1941.)

“We are entering [the United Nations] with the blind infatuation of a nation of Darius Greens, [a mindless fictional character popular at the time] ignoring all laws, disregarding all experiences, and blindly and blithely moving out with the confidence of a set of ignoramuses.…

“On no account should we have gone forward on the theory that maybe the Charter Organization will work out and so let us make a try. Unless we are ready to plumb the depths of sorrow and ill that can come from a failure.…” (J. Reuben Clark, Prophets, Principles and National Survival, p. 454. 1945.)

“For the past fifty years, as the UN lived off the perception that it provided a forum where nations could air their differences off the battlefield, more wars were fought than ever before in human history. Instead of removing the threat to peace, the UN has encouraged, even nurtured, regimes that waged violence on their neighbors, and indeed, oppressed and tortured their own people.” (Tom DeWeese Capitalism Magazine, May 5, 2005.)

“Let me tell you what Mary Robinson, the former Irish President, said these guidelines are based upon.

“According to her, the norms enunciated in these guidelines are ‘consistent with fundamental human rights and fundamental freedoms.…’

What are the fundamental rights that Mary Robinson says all nations must recognise?

“One, they include the repeal of all laws condemning homosexual sodomy.

“Two, the legalisation of same-sex marriages.

“Three, mandatory and graphic sexual training for children. She has three paragraphs on the last of these. She says the training has to include instruction, beginning when the child's at the age of 10, on how to engage in sexual intercourse with members of the same sex. Since this will of necessity be graphic, she says, ‘such materials should be exempted from pornography and obscenity laws.’

“Four, she says that all laws regulating prostitution must be eliminated. Prostitution, in short, must be legalised.

“Five, she says that the age of consent for all sexual activities should be lowered to 14.

“Finally, and most troublingly, she says: ‘There must be creation of penalties for anyone who vilifies individuals engaged in same-sex relationships.’ In short, it's not enough simply to normalise, in one fell swoop, all of international law related to homosexuality. We have to provide penalties.” (Richard Wilkins, a professor of law at Brigham Young University in the United States, was recently in Australia to warn of the threat to domestic legal and political systems posed by the International Criminal Court. LAW: International Criminal Court: the dangers, August 11, 2001.)

“There Kay watched for three days while the attendees of this important conference debated whether they would even include a reference to ‘parents’ in a document that purportedly created a child's right to sexual freedom, sexual training, and reproductive choice. At this important international meeting, it seemed that the mere mention of parental guidance on sexual matters was anathema.” (Richard G. Wilkins, describing what his associate, Kay Balmforth saw at the 1999 United Nations International Conference on Population and Development in New York. Defending the Family, July 6, 1999.)

“These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” (United Nations: Universal Declaration of Human Rights, December 1948.)

“For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” (David Rockefeller, Memoirs, p. 405. 2002.)

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national determination practiced in past centuries.” (David Rockefeller, speaking at the June 1991, Bilderberg meeting in Baden-Baden, Germany June 1991.)

“The Council on Foreign Relations is the American branch of a society which originated in England [and] believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established.” (Georgetown University Professor Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, A History of the World in Our Time, p. 951. 1966.)

“Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man's universal vision…The nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty…More intensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to be undertaken.” (Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, p. 72-300. 1970.)

“The nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political tasks.… These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order” (Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller, The Future of Federalism, 1962.)